When Cam Parry was appointed commissioner and made the liaison to the Coos County Solid Waste department he was provided with a copy of an Order and Stipulation 03 – 04-031L amending a franchise agreement with Waste Connections. The company agreed in 2003 to deliver a minimum amount of tonnage, “the prior three (3) years’ rolling average tons of acceptable solid waste,” to the Beaver Hill Disposal Site as part of its franchise and purchase of Les’ Sanitation. The order is signed by Ron Mittelstaedt, CEO of Waste Connections’ Les’ County Sanitary Service, Inc., and all three commissioners; John Griffith, Nikki Whitty and Gordon Ross.

You may read the agreement in full here Waste Connections

Records from BHDS and other locations indicate that Waste Connections may be “starving” the facility and thereby draining it of badly needed operating revenue. Until recently the current commission had not opted to enforce this agreement and Parry once characterized enforcing the conditions as “punitive”.

When asked why the commission has not enforced this agreement, County Counsel, Oubonh White explained that they were aware of it but the “board had made a decision not to” at which point Cam Parry demonstrating his prowess as an artful dodger hastily interjected the claim that the county is sending a stern letter to Waste Connections.

So which is true? Parry says they have spent a year looking into the county’s legal position. He has called enforcement “punitive” and not positive. Counselor White says “the board made a decision not to” enforce the order. Who is telling the truth? What is really in the letter to Waste Connections? Is it any wonder the public have little faith or trust in our commission?

SPECIAL NOTE: As a student of commissioner behavior since Kevin Stufflebean was in office I find Parry’s methods pretty fascinating. In the video above Parry, in an effort to convince his audience the board has been researching their legal position for a year, employs a technique of making someone else complicit in his claim. For example, he begins his spiel about spending a year examining the county’s legal position by saying, “and you know this, Randy”. Randy Sanne later confirms he had no idea what Parry was talking about but by claiming Randy knew, Parry makes him complicit in this ‘fraud’. Seconds later he tries the same technique on county counsel and looks in her direction and when she fails to acknowledge him he then includes “former county counsel”, who isn’t even present. (Former counsel was practically non-existent within about a month of Parry’s appointment). Parry, effectively enforces his claim by making unwilling and unwitting victims complicit.