Citing a letter written by Al Pettit characterizing public workers as “living off the backs of others”, county employee and community volunteer Randy Sanne asked the structure advisory committee to expel Pettit. Pettit didn’t attend last night’s meeting and no action was taken to formally remove him but other topics revolved around the significance of open meetings law.

To circumvent the complications of possibly forming a quorum outside of public view only two members, Jon Barton and JJ McLeod will be conducting department head interviews to learn what each department does. Imagine if the people chosen for these committees ever attended regular board meetings how much easier this might because they would already have a fair idea and not need to waste everyone’s time.

Attendees explained, “All they did in the one-hour meeting is list which departments are mandated by the State, which ones pay for themselves (forests, the fair, mental health, OSU extension, solid waste, and CCAT) and which ones receive State funding. That was the whole thing.”

Sanne reminded the committee that the results of these interviews as wells as results from staff questionnaires must be made available to the public. Structure committee liaison Fred Messerle informed the meeting that the Oregon Association of Counties is sending a spokesperson to lecture staff on public meeting laws on September 28 from 3 to 5PM at the Owen Building. Hopefully all the commissioners and county counsel will attend.

Getting back to Pettit for a minute, his obvious contempt for public workers is probably localized around union labor as he doesn’t appear to extend his feelings toward the Messerle family for example, Ken, Fred and Sandy who all receive public funds in the form of salaries and consulting fees yet never account for their time. Pettit’s anti-labor view is all too common, unfortunately, and is probably shared by many of the other committee members.

Firemen, law enforcement and public safety personnel are all public employees and often represented by a union to help protect their rights. My son was a public employee when he was an infantry assaultman serving in the Anbar Province where he survived dozens if not hundreds of firefights and five separate direct IED hits to his hummer. Does Pettit believe my boy and his fellow Marines were “comfortably living off the backs of others”?