We’ve all heard the shouting: County revenues are shrinking and there won’t be enough money to cover the cost of running the county! If we don’t cut expenses and increase revenues, and do it in a hurry, we won’t even be able to keep the jails open, and we’ll have to let the criminals out!

Or, we could hire a Chief Executive Officer who would be empowered to cut waste, shrink bureaucracy, reduce the payroll, and run the county government with efficiency, accountability, and a firm hand.

Two commissioners can pass a resolution to hire a chief executive officer. Doing that would impose a new level of government between the Commissioners and the department heads.

The County Administrator would be given full responsibility for managing the county, and would be assigned most of the duties that presently are divided between the three commissioners. The new CEO would be responsible for making up the county’s budget, managing the county’s finances, steering project proposals through the committees and the permitting processes, and expediting contracts.

One of the Administrator’s duties would be to inform and advise the Board of Commissioners. The Board would still make the final decision on matters that come before the county, but their decisions would be facilitated and expedited by the Administrator’s explanations of the issues, evaluations of the alternatives, and recommendations.

With a administrator managing county government, the County Commissioners’ relevance will be reduced. Their remaining duties would be mostly ceremonial, representing the County at public events and special occasions, and being present at Board of Commissioners meetings.

A second major change in the structure of county government could take place at the grassroots level. District boundaries could be drawn, and each district would elect its own commissioner. People who wanted to address the Board of Commissioners or speak to the County Administrator would be told to talk to their district commissioner first. Power can be further concentrated by raising the number of commissioners to five or seven, and by making County Commissioner an unpaid position.

Creating two new levels of government accomplishes two things: It concentrates authority in the hands of one person, and insulates that person against public opinion, employees’ complaints, citizen’s groups, and voters. A select few will be very pleased with the new arrangements.

The County Administrator will receive accolades from large corporations and business groups for throwing open the doors to the privatization of the county’s forests, minerals, infrastructure, tax money and jail.

Here’s the question: Should two un-elected commissioners be allowed to radically change the form of this county’s government by their own doing? No, of course not. Major changes in the structure of county government must never be made without having a genuine public dialogue, at least one public hearing, and a vote of the citizens of the county. It is the people’s right to decide whether they want their county managed by a single un-elected individual, or by three elected, full-time commissioners. That’s an important decision, because once the structural changes are established, it will be nearly impossible to change the county back to a form of government that is democratic, approachable, and responsive to the needs and wishes of the people.