There has been a lot of criticism of the structure advisory committee for not releasing the materials used in its deliberations and for deliberating electronically, outside the public view and an ethics complaint was filed with OGEC last week. The report has also been criticized as being nothing more than an opinion piece and provides no citation, no description of the methodology used to reach its conclusions, no access to original data to support the conclusions and the report begs criticism with the ominous admission in the first few paragraphs of a “bias” and the omission of details because facts would only render the report “meaningless”. It is laughable that anyone is expected to take it seriously.

The committee has published draft conclusions that have not been voted upon in public or are not the consensus of the entire committee but rather the bias driven agenda of two committee members and this last matter has drawn the ire of Commissioner Bob Main as the unsubstantiated report has spread statewide and raised concerns with other county commissions. The word “DRAFT” on the report would imply that the committee has not adopted the findings and that perhaps the conclusions are up for revision yet the draft has been reported in the local paper as complete and is now being widely disseminated as a final product from which the governance committee is supposed to draw inspiration for a new form of county governance.

The committee has worked together for months but only this week adopted bylaws governing how it conducts its duties. The report is un-vetted even by its own committee and Main is right to be concerned that inaccurate information is being irresponsibly loosed upon the public. Meanwhile The World, in an editorial published today, accuses Main of being a hypocrite.

Main’s criticism of the county’s structure review committee is ironic, given the committee’s history. Back in August, the then-fledgling committee came under criticism for using a private online ‘drop box,” which thwarted public access to some preliminary information. The group contritely changed its procedures to be more transparent. Now Main is unhappy because the group didn’t withhold its draft report from legal public scrutiny.

The World has yet to call for the release of the materials used by the committee to reach its conclusions, something Oregon statures require.

At Tuesday’s BOC meeting I raised the matter of holding public hearings to find viable revenue solutions to anticipated budget shortfalls and referred to the Governor’s Task Force on Federal Forest Payments and County Services issued in 2009. The problems detailed in the report are complicated and would benefit from a wide range of experience and expertise that might emerge from public hearings held after work hours but the commission did not show any enthusiasm for inviting the public to discuss the recommendations made in the report. Instead, Main said

they have invited and would welcome recommendations delivered to the board. Later, Commissioner Fred Messerle affirmed this sentiment asking for written reports but acknowledged the reports might just get shuffled around on the desk.