The World has cranked up its high powered intellectual might and worm’s eye analysis to weigh in again on the Stufflebean recall by deploying a cheesy metaphor.

Oregon’s recall law is like a fighter plane’s ejection seat. It should be reserved for emergencies.

Gag me with a spoon!

Once again it fails, so busy is it straddling both sides of the fence, to make a convincing argument denouncing the costs of a recall or how divisive to the community they may or may not be.

If the road budget decision was wrong, what would have been right? Stufflebean’s adversaries have not offered a concrete alternative. Instead, they say the real issue is not the decision itself, but the sneaky process behind it.

They’re right that the process was flawed. The cuts were rushed to a vote on New Year’s Eve, with dubious public notice. But voters must ask whether one high-profile transgression warrants an expensive special election, especially when the transgressor’s term ends in less than two years.

There is a continued insistence on the part of The World that the recall is only about one issue. The lack of transparency surrounding the road department layoffs motivated citizens to form Citizens for Fair and Open government but a copy of the committee talking points, (I am sure the paper could obtain a copy) will reveal a broad range of concerns. Recalls may be divisive, most issues are, especially when County funds and resources are being mismanaged and the taxpayer cost is far in excess of a special election.

Right or wrong the recall has gotten a lot of people to start paying attention to what is happening in the commissioners’ boardroom, asking questions, filing public records requests and watching public access television.