As reported, at the City Council Meeting on Monday a local blogger interrupted the mayor regarding a subject currently being debated by the League of Oregon Cities about allowing bloggers into executive sessions. The blogger quoted the 1st Amendment citing freedom of the press and further declared that the ONPA would strenuously object to any exclusion of bloggers from executive sessions.

So I spoke with Jean Ivey about this who had spoken with ONPA about this very matter. Here is her response

I spoke with Laurie Hieb, the executive director of the Oregon Newspaper Publisher’s Association. She told me that blogs are outside the defination of ONPA. “Print media has started suplimenting their publications with the edition of web sites, but they hold themselves to the same journilistic ethics they practice in their print versions. To answer your question… No. Their is no other ONPA member or associate in Coquille other than The Sentinal.”

A review of The Society of Professional Journalists, Code of Ethics, the code which the ONPA adheres to suggests that ethical journalists should ‘minimize harm’.

Journalists should:

— Recognize that gathering and reporting information may cause harm or discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance.
— Recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone’s privacy.
— Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.
— Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects or victims of sex crimes.
— Be judicious about naming criminal suspects before the formal filing of charges.
— Balance a criminal suspect’s fair trial rights with the public’s right to be informed.

There are numerous examples where the blogger in question has failed to meet these ethical standards and I assert publishing audio from an answering machine without prior knowledge is also highly unethical. This blogger’s primary goal has been to maximize harm. Further, he has misrepresented ONPA and inferred through his citations that he is a member in good standing when in fact he has no professional credentials.

Ivey added that neither the blogger or his blog

… are members nor, as far as I can see, do they meet the
qualifications for membership