The Port spends up to $10,000 per month for the services of two consulting firms because “… it is not possible for Port staff to be in Salem or other locations throughout the entire legislative session…” (I know a few people who would be happy to live and work in Salem full time for half that price.)

Mary,

The reason the Port engages the services of Steve Marks/The Marks Network and Ken Messerle/Coast Consulting and Services LLC, among a variety of consultants the Port relies on, is that it is not possible for Port staff to be in Salem or other locations throughout the entire legislative session, or even during non legislative periods when interim committees are meeting in Salem or Portland. Many times legislative committees will call a hearing on short notice or Port staff has other commitments and cannot attend a hearing or meeting. Steve Marks and Ken Messerle have served as the Port’s representatives at hearings, public agency meetings and meetings with legislators. Mr. Marks and Mr. Messerle primarily have kept in phone contact with Port staff with updates and have received direction from staff by phone related to testimony on issues or discussion points at meetings.

I’ve looked into your request on Steve Marks/The Marks Network and Ken Messerle/Coast Consulting and Services LLC. Port staff has not required The Marks Network or Coast Consulting to provide “scope of work” reports since much of their work requires an immediate response pursuant to a specific event.

The Marks Network did provide one written Legislative update in 2009, coinciding with the Port’s efforts to acquire the Coos Bay rail line. Both firms provided an Oregon Government Ethics Commission Lobbying Registration Statement.

Port administrative staff does not keep a record of phone calls, nor do individual Port employees. It appears there have been no memos or meeting notes produced or compiled between Port staff and The Marks Network or Coast Consulting.

Throughout both firms’ contracts, Port CEO Jeff Bishop and Chief Commercial Officer Martin Callery received ongoing verbal updates and held verbal discussions with Mr. Marks and Mr. Messerle about legislation specifically addressing the Port of Coos Bay’s rail line efforts and other issues affecting Oregon’s ports in general.

Mr. Messerle has frequently attended Port Commission meetings. I only find a few meetings in which he’s addressed the commission. Those are reflected in meeting minutes available online as follows:

http://www.portofcoosbay.com/minutes/41609.pdf

http://www.portofcoosbay.com/minutes/janmins.pdf

The Port Commission twice has amended his contract in public session, which is reflected in the following meeting minutes.

http://www.portofcoosbay.com/minutes/decmins.pdf

http://portofcoosbay.com/minutes/012011mins.pdf

Mr. Marks has infrequently attended Port Commission meetings. Port CEO Jeff Bishop has verbally updated the Port Commission at times during public meetings on the work of Mr. Marks. The meeting minute links follow:

http://www.portofcoosbay.com/minutes/julymins.pdf

http://www.portofcoosbay.com/minutes/oct1807.pdf

http://www.portofcoosbay.com/minutes/032008.pdf

http://www.portofcoosbay.com/minutes/12110.pdf

http://www.portofcoosbay.com/minutes/12110.pdf

Public Records Charges

The Port can provide you with paper or electronic copies of public records, and we will post the records on the Port web site at no charge. To provide you personal copies, the cost would be:

The Marks Network statement of monthly invoices – 3 pages, $.75.

Coast Consulting statement of monthly invoices – 8 pages, $2.00

The Marks Network 2009 Legislative update – 1 page, $.25

The Marks Network Lobbying Registration Statement – 2 pages, $.50

Coast Consulting Lobbying Registration Statement – 1 page, $.25

Total cost: $3.75

There are no records requiring a review by the Port’s attorney.

Please let me know how you’d like us to proceed with these records.

Elise Hamner