Wikileaks supporters in the Ukraine symbolize their view of the US government. Governments are right to fear their people as the recent uprising in Tunisia proves. The uprising in Tunisia may also be traced to cables leaked to the public by Wikileaks further proving when people know what their governments are doing, they will take action.

The rapid growth and expansion of technology and the internet has outpaced governmental apparatus to control or seclude sovereign actions from their people.

In some ways WikiLeaks is a traditional investigative news operation. It gets its information from a source and the journalists decide what they will publish. It needs a platform, an audience and revenue just like any other newsroom. It can also be sued, censored or attacked. But because it is trying to operate online outside of normal national jurisdictions it is harder to hold to account. It can use mirror sites and multiple servers to avoid physical restraint.

It also disseminates data on such a vast scale and directly to the public so it is posting a different threat to those in authority used to being able to influence if not control the media. It is independent and not run for profit and the people who work for it are ideologically motivated. This all makes it much harder to clamp down.

Oxford University Internet analyst John Naughton says that what WikiLeaks is really exposing is the extent to which the western democratic system has been hollowed out. It is not that what it publishes will endanger lives or make government impossible. It is that it forces power out into the open. That is why those in power are attacking it. WikiLeaks worries them because it protects its sources and gives the evidence directly and in great detail and scale to the citizen.

Unfortunately, rather than try to operate more openly and in such a way that does not incite revolutions, the US is trying to come up with laws and regulations to enable it to continue business as usual, including lying to Americans about what their government is doing.

Establishment media are also having a difficult time adapting to the new model of journalism evolving out of the whistle blower to Wikileaks to media outlet via the internet. Below is a debate held at the Frontline Club in London.

Chaired by Richard Gizbert, presenter of The Listening Post on Al Jazeera English.

David Aaronovitch, writer, broadcaster, commentator and regular columnist for The Times;

Mark Stephens, media lawyer with Finers Stephens Innocent and Julian Assange’s solicitor;

Ian Katz, deputy editor of the Guardian;

Gavin MacFayden, director of the Centre for Investigative Journalism.