President Obama commemorating the bicentennial birthday of our 16th President reminded us of Lincoln’s view of democracy, “The legitimate object of government is to do for a community of people what needs to be done but which they cannot by individual effort do at all, or do so well, by themselves.†Lincoln graciously defines what cannot be done individually to include providing for the young, helpless and afflicted and building public roads, schools and highways and maintaining the ‘machinery of government’ itself.
In the 200 years since Lincoln’s birth government has, through the implementation of subsidies, tax cuts, enterprise zones and urban renewal districts, broadened the concept of what requires community effort. These incentives are meant to entice new business and new jobs by reducing startup costs for free enterprise. This is great if creates jobs but what is the return on investment to the taxpaying public? What is the price to the community per job?
Enterprise zones let qualifying businesses receive total exemption from the property taxes normally assessed on new plant and equipment for at least three years and possibly up to five years. In Oregon, these zones, 59 of them are primarily designated in economically depressed areas, 48 rural.
A study entitled “OREGON ENTERPRISE ZONE TAX ABATEMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STUDY AND URBAN RENEWAL STUDYâ€, published by Portland State University concludes, “The cost per job created appears to be relatively high, and the comparison of reported employment growth with data from the Employment Department indicates that the reported employment growth may be overstated, which would further increase the abatement cost per job created.â€
Locally, we have a prominent example of government subsidy at work in the hopes of job creation at the Bandon Dunes Golf Resort. According to Pulitzer Prize winning reporter, David Cay Johnston in his book “Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (and stick you with the bill)â€, the world famous golf course benefits from four government subsidies that exceed payroll for 325 employees and amounts to $37,000 per full time employee.
Perhaps even more famously, at least locally, a new airport terminal was built to manage the increase from 3 executive jets per year to over 5,000 private jets ferrying golfers to the self contained resort, at a price tag of $31M, half from a ticket tax and half from the Oregon State Lottery. So far, those 325 jobs are costing Oregon taxpayers quite a bit.
One of the recommendations in the PSU study is to mandate a thorough fiscal assessment of the impact on local taxing districts for local taxing authorities and offer an opt-out provision if it isn’t paying off. In Coos County we need only look at the empirical data and rising unemployment rates to decide if our tax dollars have been wisely invested and are producing badly needed jobs.
Oregon Resources Corporation qualifies for the enterprise zone property tax exemptions, (as does Bandon Dunes) and may soon enter into a mineral lease agreement with the County to mine or explore up to 8,000 acres of County timberlands for chromite ore. Coos County Commissioners Griffith, Whitty and Stufflebean took steps last December to further assist ORC by laying off 22 workers thereby freeing up $450K of Road Department funds to improve W Beaver Hill Road necessary for ORC mining operations.
South Coast Development Corporation formed, according to Whitty, as a liaison between government and private enterprise supports ORC and having the County pay for road improvements. Coos County funds SCDC $10,000 annually to attract business into the area and ORC promises upwards of 70 jobs if they reach full production.
Commissioner Main has called for the County to conduct some in depth due diligence before committing county road funds or entering into any leases. Considering ORC has already cost the local economy 22 jobs part of that due diligence should be to accurately determine the ROI to the citizens of Coos County for their investment.
A final note on enterprise zones – Coos County with its high unemployment and low median income clearly meets the criteria for an enterprise zone and the legislature makes no distinction about what brings a company to do business within an enterprise zone. Nevertheless, ORC or any other mining venture is only here because of the resources available and not with the direct intent of boosting local employment.
Without the chromite ore ORC would not be here zone or no zone. To further subsidize ORC by laying off workers and funding road improvements does not seem appropriate for a county in such dire economic straits that it qualifies as an enterprise zone in the first place.
I would like to publicly ask TinCup Ronnie, can ya tell us now big guy?
Opitz said he’s gotten two phone calls from companies checking the status of the pipeline project. Though he won’t identify the prospects, he said he has firm commitments from “more than one” company to set up shop when the pipeline is completed.
He’s talkin about his first illigitimate pipeline. So Ronnie, where are your two companies? Where are the jobs?
This comment from 07.
This taken from the Dec. 07 Chamber meeting:
SCDC – Ron Opitz said he is excited about the expansion he’s seeing in the entire region. He said
that he is seeing progress with the cities, counties and private entities all working together for the
good of the community and they all have a very important part to play.
He said that he has sent out 3 new industrial project requests within the last 30-40 days and that our
area continues to compete; the Asian project is continuing to move forward with Coos Bay and
Melbourne, Australia being considered for their business location. He said that this would be a ½
billion dollar industry.
Ron stated that the Jordan Cove project continues to move ahead and this would have an economic
impact on the entire region of the state; this project has been in the planning stages for over a year
and he is beginning to see the plans coming to fruition.
Ron reported that the ACS expansion includes 85 jobs, Hardin Optical in Bandon will offer 50 jobs,
Ross Piping in Coquille has 20 employees and is bringing in a second business that will require 10
more employees. The Southport Lumber expansion provided 10 additional jobs.
Another encouraging sign is that unemployment is the lowest in 1 ½ decades and he has been seeing
dynamic changes – people moving into the area, lots of changes going on at the Boys & Girls Club,
the coal bed testing continues. Ron commended The Mill for the excellent banquet that they catered
for the Boys & Girls Club.
NOW MY QUESTION IS, WHEN DOES OPTIMISM BECOME – “LET’S SEE HOW MUCH SMOKE WE CAN BLOW UP THIS COUNTIES ASS?
I’d like Tin Cup Opitz to show us all this great expansion, oh and all these businesses he talks to who want to relocate here = oops, sorry, can’t tell ya that one, cuz then you can find out I’m just a ‘smokin.
The Mineral Rights Puzzle
If I owned a 100 acres and agreed to give away 97 percent of my mineral rights, that is OK. But did I know I could have given just 85 Percent away.
8
8 = 1 = whole 100%
But wait a moment, I was offered 3 percent, but my neighbor was getting
4
8 = .50 = 1/2 50%
3.5 percent for his mineral rights. The person across the road was only
2
8 = .25 = 1/4 25%
getting 1/8 payment for their mineral rights, Boy, they sure suckered them.
1
8 = .125 = 1/8 12.5%
Who do you want to be, the one that got suckered, or the one who
1/32 .031 = 1/32 3.12%
obtained an expert to navigate and negotiate the joys of Mineral Rights.
den
As you will notice they are preparing to go behind the “we can’t talk about this because it is a land use issue and we sit on the board†Is there not something out of whack about that. The chickens being supervise by the hen house master, she and he fox.
I do not understand at this time, but soon will, the process and procedure permission and permits and agreements which turn into planning board applications and land use procedures and appealed to the Land us board.
Maybe someone with savvy could give a starting point course on this subject.
The 6 lease sites. Like whom is the lesser, and whom is the leasee. What was all the planning department approval about, and where do the commissioners fit in.
I understand some of the 6 leases, or one went on appeal to land use board.
There was some of that in the World, but have to watch what you read there, no investigating reporting, little history, little education.
Honestly, I do not know what items on Bob’s list may already have been addressed in earlier planning commission hearings or meetings. According to Stufflebean there has been no decision yet to lay asphalt on W Beaver Hill Road but he reminded me that this is a ‘land use issue also’, and I do not know what that has to do with the road.
We will find out shortly just how much due diligence the prior board did regarding ORC and how much more needs to be done.
Am I to assume these issues Bob Main is addressing, which are what any educated person, either through schooling or work experience would require, have not even been brought up?
And the Commissioners are trying to barrel ahead with contracts without protecting the financial interest of the county taxpayers?
We must demand they do the right thing , such as Main has suggested.
Numb nuts.
From: “Jody McCaffree”
Date: February 16, 2009 11:42:45 AM MST (CA)
To:
Subject: Important Meetings Re: Chromite Mining / Recall Info
ATTENTION: Coos County Residents:
Important Meetings Coming up on Chromite Mining /
Updates on the Recall of Commissioner Stufflebean
RECALL: If you have signed petitions out there or know of any that are floating around please call Larry VanElsberg 756-2697 and give him the numbers and/or make arrangements to turn them in. Even if there are only 5 or 6 to a page it is O.K., as long as the petition circulator has signed the sheet and dated it at the bottom. Watch this site for locations where Coos County registered voters can sign to recall Kevin Stufflebean :http://recallkevin.wordpress.com/.
CHROMITE MINING: Please let Commissioners Nikki Whitty and Kevin Stufflebean know that you would like them to support Bob Main’s suggested ways to protect the county regarding the Oregon Resources Corp current mining proposal. They have each been mailed a copy of Bob’s thoughts already (See below.). Public meeting to be held regarding the mining contract on Feb 24th at 9:00 a.m. in Coquille:
Address:
Coos County Courthouse
250 N. Baxter
Coquille, OR 97423
Fax: (541) 396-4861
Commissioner Nikki Whitty- Chair
(541) 396-3121 ext 247
nwhitty@CO.COOS.OR.US
Commissioner Kevin Stufflebean – Vice Chair
kstufflebean@CO.COOS.OR.US
(541) 396-3121 ext 281
Several years ago the county gave away are natural gas rights for an 1/8th royalty or 12.5%, which is the percentage given for those who do not negotiate. Oregon Resources Corp ( Foreign Controlled Mining Corp) wants the counties mineral rights for 3%. Perhaps we should be finding out what exactly these rights are worth before we just believe the salesman from the mining company. I have serous concerns that we could end up losing millions of dollars due to the lack of knowledge and understanding about these issues by our local officials. Bob Main has submitted some thoughts below which would help the process have better accountability. It would be far better to have too many offers for our mineral rights than too few…
The video below shows mining operations in GOA. It starts out rather slow but raises some serious issues regarding what can happen.
http://infochangeindia.org/Infochange-documentary.html
_________________________________________________________
—– Original Message —–
From: Bob Main
To: Nikki Whitty ; Kevin Stufflebean ; Jacki Haggerty ; Joanna Lyons
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:35 PM
Subject: Chromite mining
Some thoughts on the Chromite Mining issue.
1. 75 jobs will be a boost to the local economy.
2. The ancillary economic impact of related sales will help our local economy.
3. The exploration agreement should be separate and distinct from the actual lease of the property for mining purposes.
4. Coos County should be due diligent and perform their own exploration to determine the extent and content of the minerals / metals that the citizens of Coos County own.
5. The lease by Coos County should only be for specific minerals i.e. chromite, garnet. All other minerals / metals should be a separate contract.
6. Coos County should enlist the help of an attorney that specializes in mineral leases.
7. Royalties, etc. should be thoroughly researched, thereby, providing the citizens of Coos County the best return for their minerals / metals.
8. The mechanism for payment of the royalties should be thoroughly researched.
9. 1.34 million tons of unrefined chromite ore per year may contain 1 ppm (parts per million) of platinum would mean approximately 40,000 troy ounces of platinum per year. Platinum is currently at about $1,050 per ounce x 40,000 ounces = $ 42,000,000 per year for the citizens of Coos County. Gold is currently around $900 per ounce.
10.What happens to the lease if ORC goes out of business? Should the lease terminate and not be absorbed by another company.
11.$450,000 road improvement in the URS report. Who should bear the burden of this cost?
We need to be very cautious and perform due diligence before entering into an contractual arrangement!
Bob Main
February 13, 2009
*********************************************************
Subject: Letter to Editor – Chromite Mining in Progress. 2/15/09 by Denny Powell
Important Chromite mining meeting the public needs to know about. February, 2/18/2009 executive meeting, briefing from County council to tell the Commissioners just what they can publicly, talk about. February, 24 2009, meeting and location not posted at this writing.
Attending the February 3, 2009 work session between Coos County Commissioners, Oregon Resources Corp. ORC, and South Coast Development Council SCDC, was a discovery process. Nikki Whitty “learned so many things†Kevin Stufflebean, did not know, ORC, wanted to look at more areas, about 6000 acres more. Read on, there are more discoveries.
The county has sent to ORC on November 12, 2008, some type of document, resulting in ORC requesting this meeting for clarification of the requirements in the document. I learned at a recent time that there may have been two separate initiations of documents by the county in November 08. To look at the documents it is required of me to make a “public records request†I did that on 2/13/08. I have $5.00 in that deal so far.
Some of the Counties revenue sources from entering into an agreement with ORC, would include: Leases, land agreements, mineral rights agreements, conditional use agreements, royalties, and taxes.
Under taxes, Nikki described how the ORC processing plant, more than likely would be able to receive the tax breaks for an enterprise zone. First three years. Then an extension of two years, given by the county commissioners. Then the possibility of extended extension requiring a granting by the state, the taxing districts and the county commissioners.
This is the meeting where Stufflebean and Nikki found out their road department reorganization master plan, action, had a couple of broken legs. ORC commissioned a company called URS Corp. in late 2007 to conduct, and prepare a, Pavement Analysis Report. This report was completed June 8, 2008. The report subject, West Beaver Hill Road. In my opinion the County reacted to this report by preparing an unknown and unpublicized reorganization of the road department to make available funds to maintain for one to 10 years the West Beaver Hill Road so ORC could haul their product to their processing plant in Bunker Hill.
The URS report said the County needed to maintain the road, and recommending three Alternatives to do so. However, URS conclusions, page 8-4 “The alternatives ……will allow ORC to use and maintain West Beaver Hill Roadâ€. The report implies, ORC will be the responsible party in maintaining the road for their mining operation, with the County doing the work, because its their road. There are three alternatives relating to applying additional asphalt of from one to four inches over a 10 year period or possibly a complete rebuild, down to the substructure. Alternative 1, “requires the County to invest about $450,000 prior to the start of mining operationsâ€. Was there an agreement in writing between Coos County and ORC concerning the $450,000, don’t know. Is it not clear just who the responsible party is, or the funding, to pay for the road maintenance for ORC’s mining operation. I say yes.
What I do know, ORC is not ready to pay the County their portion of the beaver hill road project. That indicates their was an agreement. Was it in writing, public document. It will be Feb. or 2nd quarter 2010, or more before they start construction of the processing plant. and an 8 to 10 month construction period puts them into 2011-12. “Timing is bad now†for ORC to contribute to the roads, in fact not this year. They are considering that won’t happen until 6 months after production begins, and or 6 months after all the permitting. They cannot control the permitting. Bob Main thought that would be after 2011, Nikki Whitty did not think Kevin Stufflebean was expecting the payment to start this June 09. You can see how all three commissioners are on a different page. Stufflebean did expect ORC road payment this June 09, thus the reorganization of the road department budget.
That plan for reorganization of the road department includes creating reserve fund. Starting the 08-09 year with a $400,000 infusion, and then a 2 million infusion each year for five years, totaling $10,400,000 over a five year period. That department is fat in funds. There is more, but now the citizens of Coos County need more public information about the Counties current and future plans for Chromite mining, how ORC may fit in those plans. Information from the County Commissioners, Will they step up to the plate?
Audio DVD reference from Mary Geddry
Denny Powell
Coos Bay OR 97420
541.269.7361
***********************************************************
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2006_August_7/ai_n16610174
Oregon Resources Corp. Restructures Transaction for Acquisition of Industrial Property
Business Wire , August 7, 2006
HAMILTON, Bermuda — Resource Finance & Investment Limited (“RFI”) (OTCBB:RFIVF) is pleased to report that its wholly owned subsidiary Oregon Resources Corporation (ORC) and Teck Cominco American Incorporated (TCAI) have agreed to restructure the terms of a Letter of Intent relating to the 28.44 acre industrial property in Coos Bay, Oregon, previously announced, into a Lease/Purchase agreement.
The terms of the agreement provide for the payment of a $200,000 security deposit and twelve monthly payments of $25,000. At the end of the 12 month period ORC has the option to purchase the property or extend the lease on a monthly basis. The security deposit and the monthly payments will be credited as part of the total purchase consideration. The security deposit and first months lease payment have been paid to TCAI.
The Lease/Purchase agreement provides ORC with immediate access to the site for the construction and commissioning of a 10tph mineral processing pilot plant which ORC acquired in 2005 and had been de commissioned and made ready for transporting to the Coos Bay site. The pilot plant will assist with the determination of the flow sheet for the 400,000 tpa larger scale plant as envisaged in the company’s feasibility and operating plan.
The property has a ship loading dock, storage silo and water treatment facility and is divided by a rail spur. It has access to the main interstate routes, natural gas supply and is in close proximity to ORC’s heavy mineral sand deposits.
“ORC appreciates the flexibility provided by TCAI in the Lease/Purchase agreement and is eager to continue advancing its plan to be in full production within 18 months. Upon completion, this property will house all the main mineral processing components together with transportation, electricity and natural gas access and provide for an efficient process flow and reduced operating costs”, commented Philip Garratt, RFI’s President & CEO.
TCAI of Spokane, Washington is a subsidiary of Teck Cominco Limited of Vancouver, Canada.
Resource Finance and Investment Ltd is involved in the development of industrial minerals and exploration for gold and base metals in North America. Operations are directed through two wholly owned subsidiaries and an approximate 30% holding in Cadillac Mining Corp (CXQ-TSXV).
Legal Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statement
This press release contains “forward looking statements” including forward looking statements as that term is defined in Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Statements in this press release which are not purely historical are forward looking statements and include any statements regarding beliefs, expectation or intentions concerning the future. Forward looking statements in this press release include, but are not limited to statements regarding the Corporation’s anticipation that the Mineral Claims will prove to be economically viable on a going forward basis, and the Company’s anticipation that it can successfully raise the capital necessary to acquire and exploit the Mineral Claims, with or without an equity offering.
It is important to note that the Corporation’s actual outcomes may differ materially from those in forward looking statements contained in this press release. Although the Company believes that the beliefs, plans, expectations and intentions contained in this press release are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such beliefs, plans, expectations and intentions will prove to be accurate. Readers should refer to the risks disclosures in the Company’s public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Business Wire
COPYRIGHT 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning
Thanks for bringing this to the public’s attention, Den. I plan on attending the executive session although I will be unable, due to Oregon Open Records Laws to report on the content.
It is important for citizens to attend the regular meeting immediately following en mass and to get their comments on the public record. Doing so places responsibility upon the commissioners in the event they take action contrary to public notification which results in liability to the County.
Important Chromite mining meeting the public needs to know about. February, 2/18/2009 executive meeting, briefing from County council to tell the Commissioners just what they can publicly, talk about. February, 24 2009, meeting and location not posted at this writing.
Attending the February 3, 2009 work session between Coos County Commissioners, Oregon resources Corp. ORC, and South Coast Development Council SCDC, was a discovery process. Nikki Whitty “learned so many things†Kevin Stufflebean, did not know, ORC, wanted to look at more areas, about 6000 acres more. Read on, there are more discoveries.
The county has send to ORC on November 12, 2008, some type of document, resulting in ORC requesting this meeting for clarification of the requirements in the document. I learned at a recent time that there may have been two separate initiations of documents by the county in November 08. To look at the documents it is required of me to make a “public records request†I did that on 2/13/08. I have $5.00 in that deal so far.
Some of the Counties revenue sources from entering into an agreement with ORC, would include: Leases, land agreements, mineral rights agreements, conditional use agreements, royalties, and taxes.
Under taxes, Nikki described how the ORC processing plant, more than likely would be able to receive the tax breaks for an enterprise zone. First three years. Then an extension of two years, given by the county commissioners. Then the possibility of extended extension requiring a granting by the state, the taxing districts and the county commissioners.
This is the meeting where Stufflebean and Nikki found out their road department reorganization master plan, action, had a couple of broken legs. ORC commissioned a company called URS Corp. in late 2007 to conduct, and prepare a, Pavement Analysis Report. This report was completed June 8, 2008. The report subject, West Beaver Hill Road. In my opinion the County reacted to this report by preparing an unknown and unpublicized reorganization of the road department to make available funds to maintain for one to 10 years the West Beaver Hill Road so ORC could haul their product to their processing plant in Bunker Hill.
The URS report said the County needed to maintain the road, and recommending three Alternatives to do so. However, URS conclusions, page 8-4 “The alternatives ……will allow ORC to use and maintain West Beaver Hill Roadâ€. The report implies, ORC will be the responsible party in maintaining the road for their mining operation, with the County doing the work, because its their road. There are three alternatives relating to applying additional asphalt of from one to four inches over a 10 year period or possibly a complete rebuild, down to the substructure. Alternative 1, “requires the County to invest about $450,000 prior to the start of mining operationsâ€. Was there an agreement in writing between Coos County and ORC concerning the $450,000, don’t know. Is it not clear just who the responsible party is, or the funding, to pay for the road maintenance for ORC’s mining operation. I say yes.
What I do know, ORC is not ready to pay the County their portion of the beaver hill road project. That indicates their was an agreement. Was it in writing, public document. It will be Feb. or 2nd quarter 2010, or more before they start construction of the processing plant. and an 8 to 10 month construction period puts them into 2011-12. “Timing is bad now†for ORC to contribute to the roads, in fact not this year. They are considering that won’t happen until 6 months after production begins, and or 6 months after all the permitting. They cannot control the permitting. Bob Main thought that would be after 2011, Nikki Whitty did not think Kevin Stufflebean was expecting the payment to start this June 09. You can see how all three commissioners are on a different page. Stufflebean did expect ORC road payment this June 09, thus the reorganization of the road department budget.
That plan for reorganization of the road department includes creating reserve fund. Starting the 08-09 year with a $400,000 infusion, and then a 2 million infusion each year for five years, totaling $10,400,000 over a five year period. That department is fat in funds. There is more, but now the citizens of Coos County need more public information about the Counties current and future plans for Chromite mining, how ORC may fit in those plans. Information from the County Commissioners, Will they step up to the plate?
Audio DVD reference from Mary Geddry