Published on Tuesday, July 23, 2013 by Common Dreams
Dempsey declares US intervention would be costly to US taxpayers, US troops, and the world
Dempsey delivered the warning in a letter addressing the Chairman of the Senate, after Senator John McCain vowed to block the general's reappointment over his perceived reluctance to send the US military into Syria.
It is the strongest statement against US military intervention in Syria to emerge from the Pentagon since the US has deliberated intervention.
With a nod to the brutal and long-term invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, Dempsey stated that once the US gets involved in Syria it will be very difficult to leave and military invasion could "empower extremists or unleash the very chemical weapons we seek to control."
Dempsey declared that establishing a "no-fly zone" in Syria—which John McCain strongly supports—is estimated to cost approximately one billion dollars per month. Dempsey outlined risks that include "the loss of U.S. aircraft, which would require us to insert personnel recovery forces. It may also fail to reduce the violence or shift the momentum because the regime relies overwhelmingly on surface fires—mortars, artillery, and missiles."
The statement came as House and Senate intelligence committees gave their final approval Monday to a shipment of arms to Syrian fighters against the Assad regime. The plan, introduced by Obama last month, was delayed by debates in Congress.
Last week, Dempsey stated that the Obama administration is considering direct military strikes in Syria.
_____________________
Why all the fuss? obama and hillary and kerry all been arming and training al queda for years in Syria.
Why pretend they aren’t? obama is f—ing the entire Middle East, and who has tried to stop him ?
Any democrat? Any republican?
Keep voting for the one corporate party and this is all you can expect to get.
But as long as the banksters and politicians and the profits keep flowing, obama can kill as many people as he wants.