Let me preface this by saying I have not reviewed the proposed agreements so I don’t know all the details. Nonetheless, the recent proposal for Quorum Health to take over operations at Bay Area Hospital (BAH) in Coos Bay, Oregon, raises significant concerns about the future of healthcare in the region. Quorum Health, a for-profit hospital operator with a turbulent financial history, has positioned itself as a potential savior for the struggling community hospital. However, a deeper examination of Quorum’s past, the broader outcomes of similar hospital acquisitions, and the potential conflicts with BAH’s existing taxing district suggest that this merger may create more problems than it solves.
Quorum Health was formed in 2016 as a spin-off from Community Health Systems (CHS), inheriting financially distressed hospitals primarily in rural areas. Within four years, the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, citing nearly $500 million in debt. Following restructuring, Quorum emerged under the control of private equity firms, which are often criticized for prioritizing profits over patient care. Given this history, the proposed acquisition of BAH raises critical questions about how Quorum will finance its promised investments and whether patient care will suffer as a result.
Research on hospital mergers and acquisitions across the United States paints a troubling picture. Studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine and JAMA have shown that hospital takeovers by for-profit entities often result in:
Declines in patient satisfaction – Measures such as overall hospital ratings and staff responsiveness tend to drop following privatization.
No significant improvements in patient outcomes – Contrary to claims that acquisitions improve quality of care, research indicates that mortality and readmission rates typically remain unchanged.
Increased costs for patients – Privatized hospitals are more likely to raise prices and introduce aggressive billing practices to maximize revenue.
Service and staffing reductions – In many cases, new management eliminates essential but less profitable services, including maternity care, mental health services, and emergency department resources.
Given these trends, it is not unreasonable to expect that a Quorum-managed BAH could see similar negative effects. Patients may face higher costs and diminished care, while staff could encounter layoffs or increased workloads.
A unique complication in this deal, in my mind, is that BAH operates within a taxpayer-funded health district, meaning that local residents contribute directly to the hospital’s funding through property taxes. If Quorum assumes control of BAH, it stands to benefit from these public funds while simultaneously operating as a for-profit entity. This raises concerns, in my opinion:
Who controls the funds? Will tax dollars be used exclusively to improve patient care, or will they subsidize Quorum’s corporate profits?
Transparency issues – Will the community retain oversight on spending decisions, or will financial disclosures become more opaque under private ownership?
Service prioritization – Will Quorum maintain essential services, even if they are unprofitable, or will it cut programs that do not generate high margins?
History suggests that for-profit operators prioritize cost-cutting and revenue generation over community needs. Without strong oversight, this arrangement could result in a transfer of public wealth into private hands, all while reducing the quality of care for local residents.
Rather than handing control of BAH to Quorum Health, alternative approaches should be considered:
State Intervention: Oregon lawmakers are already considering Senate Bill 1000, which would provide state funding to stabilize BAH without requiring a private takeover. A publicly funded rescue could maintain community control and ensure that tax dollars are used for patient care rather than corporate profits.
Nonprofit Management Model: Many successful hospitals operate under nonprofit structures, prioritizing community health over shareholder value. Exploring partnerships with established nonprofit healthcare systems could provide a more sustainable solution.
Greater Public Oversight: If the Quorum deal moves forward, strict financial and operational transparency requirements must be established to ensure that taxpayer funds remain focused on healthcare rather than investor returns.
The debate over BAH’s future highlights a broader issue: the privatization of essential services often leads to worse outcomes for customers, patients, and staff. When healthcare is run for profit, financial interests inevitably conflict with the mission of providing high-quality, accessible care. The case of Quorum Health’s acquisition of BAH is yet another example of why privatization is a flawed model for critical public services.
As the community weighs this decision, residents and policymakers must ask: Who truly benefits the most from this deal? If history is any guide, the answer may not be the patients who rely on Bay Area Hospital for their healthcare needs.
Photo BAH website
We need your help. While Geddry is a volunteer effort there are still costs to providing pro-democracy content to Coos County. Your donation will help cover printing costs, web hosting fees, and of course we need to raise money for our noncommercial community radio station to cover the costs of equipment.
Please make your tax deductible donation here because we can’t do this alone.