March 13 is the date for the Coos County Commissioners to decide whether or not to permit The Williams Companies, Inc., owners of a nationwide system of interstate natural gas pipelines, and one of the nation’s largest transporters of natural gas, to bury 2.4 miles of 36-inch diameter high-pressure pipeline in the Haynes Inlet. That would be the first leg of the Pacific Connector pipeline that will run untapped 234 miles from the proposed liquid natural gas (LNG) terminal in Coos Bay to the natural gas pipeline hub at Malin, Oregon.
On the 13th, before the Commissioners take their vote, the County’s Hearings Officer, attorney Andrew Stamp will deliver his long-expected decision that the silt-sensitive, filter-feeding, native Olympia oysters in Haynes Inlet will not be harmed by the many tons of silt and debris that will be churned up and carried to and fro by the tides. There will be hardly any harm at all because of the measures The Williams Companies, Inc. will take to protect the oysters. After listening to that high-budget whopper, the Commissioners will vote.That’s going to be interesting.
Commission Chairman Fred Messerle must recuse himself, because the proposed pipeline would cross his property, and because his wife, Sandra Geiser-Messerle, is the Executive Director of the South Coast Development Council that has been an enthusiastic promoter of the LNG terminal and pipeline since the idea was first floated.
Commissioner Cam Parry is a passionate supporter of the pipeline and terminal. For import or export, oysters or no oysters, it doesn’t matter, he’s for it. Here’s where it gets interesting.
If Commissioner Bob Main listens to the chorus of voices of homeowners, farmers, foresters, fishermen, environmentalist, and anti-LNG activists who want to stop the pipeline, and ponders what they are saying, and then decides that the right thing to do is to vote against permitting dredging a trench through Haynes Inlet, the vote would be a one-to-one tie, and there would be no way of breaking it, because the Chairman of the Board, whose job it is to break ties, will have recused himself. Isn’t that interesting?
If you’re a commissioner, there are times when you have to decide between your own conscience, and the desires of an energy company and its friends in the business community. Sometimes it’s difficult to make the right decision because of all the political pressure and public exposure. The usual maneuver in cases like this is to proclaim one’s firm opposition to the project, and then say, “but, I don’t want to stand in the way of progress, or be the one responsible for losing all those jobs,” and then vote for it. That’s the easiest way, and you don’t have to pay for it until the next election.
No matter what happens Commissioner Messerle will find a way to grant the permit, and that will give the green light to Williams and its corporate partners, Fort Chicago Energy Partners and PG&E Corporation. They’ll bury their pipe in the inlet and start bulldozing their way to Malin. The native oysters in Haynes Inlet will be goners, along with the commercial oysters, the fish, the clams, and most of the marine life in the estuaries and in the bay all the way out past the jetties. Pipelines have caused that kind of devastation in other bays, and it doesn’t take a lot of silt to do it. If it happens in Coos Bay all of us are going to regret it for a very long time to come.
Which of the Messerle Clan already got the pipe removed from their property?
I know I read it, and it wouldn’t have been anywhere in this county but this blog.
As soon as the wealthy among us got their property removed from consideration, on the far side of the bridge and the Messerle hollar, it has become a free for all. I guess it’s true, the ignorant in Coos County don’t care if their neighbors’ land is taken by a foreign corporation, but many more of us do.Maybe the ORC ‘boys’ will come on and tell us why THEY aren’t paying property taxes on their land? And what they did to deserve it.
Since I wrote the above, I had a meeting with a close 30 year Messerle family friend who has bet me $1 that Messerle will do his best possible imitation of Pontious Pilate and having discussed Main’s proposed “advisory” ballot measure; Messerle will propose a second “advisory” ballot measure covering the pipeline.
Ima not so sure. “Recuse” for Messerle meaning to excuse himself from the vote because of a POSSIBLE inability to be impartial. I believe the scanario will go like this. There will be no discussion of recuse unless Robert Bob Main IMMEDIATELY upon pipeline discussion sets out a detailed record of Messerles prior objection to the pipleine; using the World paper (Messerles pals) archives (he will be told that he is out of order). . Messerle will be silent. Messerle briefly describes what the vote entails; the laying of a pipe. No mention of oysters; no metion of the documented danger to people within one half mile on either side of the pipeline; no mention of the pipeline crossing his property. Stamp speaks and says go for it. The floor is opened for discussion. Heated debate. Main speaks and says no. Parry speaks and says go for it. Messerle tells us how difficult this is for him; he must put a majority of the people ahead of himself; he gives a diatribe about the silliness of the oyster lovers who are stopping progress. He will say that he has not seeen sufficient data from either side to make such an important decision. He wants to hear from those people whose land the pipeline crosses. He will request specific data (he’ll be able to identify something) from both sides and he will set another vote during the first week of June. He will get gas from his pals. He will get gas from his pal the garbage can liner editor. He is also convinced that his pals can get him elected in May. He will vote yes in June if elected figuring that the oyster lovers have a few years in court before any pipe is laid. A few years from now, Williams will find a reason (coincidently) not to lay their pipe across Messerle land. Hopefully I am wrong.
Just google “Gladstone Harbor dredging” to see what type of issues we can expect to see, when they build this. Some will profit, more will lose.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/tale-of-two-australias-gas-rush-splits-town-2012-02-26?pagenumber=1
The number of animals that had any lesions at all is highest, closest to the area of the dredging and as you move further away the intensity of that declines http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-03-01/expert-not-ruling-out-sick-fish-dredging-link/3861912?section=qld