“The best victory is when the opponent surrenders of its own accord before there are any actual hostilities… It is best to win without fighting.” Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Coos County is under siege and an occupying army has already breached the perimeter and aligned itself with the local economic development cabal. We may not be seeing armed and camouflaged troops walking through our streets yet but many of the traditional elements of war are well underway. Ongoing attempts to win “hearts and minds” in favor of the occupiers, Veresen. Inc., has been in full sway for sometime, aided and abetted amongst others by the industry funded pro-gas “grassroots” organization calling itself BS Oregon. The spoils of this occupation include more than 400 water bodies, clean air, and the acquisition of private timber and ranch lands from unwilling landowners. Allies of the invasion have even figured out a way to plunder the treasury without firing a shot in the form of the so-called CEP (Community Enhancement Plan).
Meanwhile, our defensive line, the boots on the ground, the very people who must live with the consequences, our local infantry as it were is constrained by rules established from what any combat veteran will refer to as “rear echelon mother-fuckers” or REMFs. REMFs are defined as those who issue orders but never have to carry out their own missions or bury the results. In the matter of the proposed Jordan Cove LNG export terminal, a project that The Oregonian reports would become the single largest CO2 emitter in the State of Oregon, the REMFs in our war is FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission).
As seasoned victims of many a dirty industrial development campaign Coos County citizens recognize psy-ops when they see them. The astroturf BS Oregon is running ads with handsome, smiling construction workers wearing pristine hardhats and promising that Coos County will see decades of prosperity even though these same promises by the same industry have fallen way short in other communities. Yesterday, Senator Barbara Boxer (CA) argued against Congress approving construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline and used Port Arthur, Texas as one of her examples of how prosperity and fossil-fuel development do not coincide.
Documents prepared by a public relations firm for Transcanada and believed to also be working with Veresen, Inc detail the depths that the industry is willing to stoop to, in the words of Sun Tzu, get the opponent to surrender.
“All warfare is based on deception.” Sun Tzu
- One of the campaign’s most important steps involves developing a narrative that clearly tells the compelling Energy East Pipeline story and provides the opportunity for TransCanada to define the project on its own terms… the four agreed-upon campaign platforms of Safety; Environmental Stewardship; Economic Benefits & Jobs; and National (or Strategic) Interest. To do this, we will audit existing positive messaging and creative assets, and will meet with key members of the project team to develop an umbrella message and core messages about the pipeline
- We will research the editorial calendars of key media and align our promotional efforts with them for long-lead opportunities especially.
- Media will prove a critical player in conveying our messages. We will build upon existing relationships and foster new ones with key local/national media
- Paid Media: Amplification of any promote efforts will be critical to expanding the people we reach with our stories. When positive earned coverage is published, we will amplify it using a content amplification vendor. In addition, we will use Paid Media to effectively deploy our narrative in highly contextual and targeted spaces to inform or engage the audience.
“If we do not wish to fight, we can prevent the enemy from engaging us even though the lines of our encampment be merely traced out on the ground. All we need to do is to throw something odd and unaccountable in his way.” Sun Tzu
As an occupied territory how do we avoid hostilities yet still fight back against such an organized enemy while being simultaneously tethered by our own government? The right of local, community self-government is a fundamental, individual political right – exercised collectively – of people to govern the local communities in which they reside. The right of local, community self-government is inherent and inalienable. It derives necessarily from the fundamental principle that all political power is inherent in the people, is exercised by them for their benefit, and is subject to their control. Local communities, when exercising the people’s right of local, community self-government, are not subject to constraints on local lawmaking imposed by state and federal governments. This is our community and we decide, not FERC.
We fight back not by engaging on the regulatory battlefield and playing by the enemy’s rigged rules but by exercising our inalienable right to local self government and forcing the battle onto an unexpected front. We enact law. State authorized powers of such local governments are distinct and apart from the people’s right of local, community self-government. The peoples’ right is not dependent upon state delegation, and so, cannot be diminished by limitations placed on local governments by other governments.
A citizen initiative to assert and reclaim our right to local self-government was filed on November 4, 2014. The Coos County Right to a Sustainable Energy Future Ordinance will ensure that our community, not FERC, has the right to democratically decide whether we want to risk our health and environment and our economy on non sustainable energy systems.
PSE SCIENCE SUMMARIES
PSE Science Summaries offer downloadable and printable summaries of the current state of knowledge for a variety of energy and environment issues, including climate change, air and water impacts, human health, and sustainability. All summaries are available free-of-charge.
– See more at: http://www.psehealthyenergy.org/site/view/1055#sthash.C9vQ5jla.dpuf
http://www.psehealthyenergy.org/site/view/1055
this one site has enough evidence to correct MarkM’s mistakes on the environment. If he disagrees with any of these scientific studies, maybe he can go take it up with those people and see how far his badgering gets him. He is a cyberthug with twisted facts that he never expects to be challenged on. So maybe he will go digest some of these scientific studies and hash out his differences with those scientists before he comes on here spewing his crap and expecting it to be swallowed. One theme runs through these reports. “The science should be put before risky industrial processes are allowed to be scaled.”
I don’t think this study shows what you think it shows. For one thing it admits that “variability and intermittency” are serious roadblocks to wind and solar energy generation. I agree with that assessment. Without an energy storage system that we currently do not have, wind and solar are not practical for everyday use.
Furthermore, the “80-100%” energy projection is speculative upon further development. Many of the studies project into the year 2050. Again, this is what I’ve been saying. By mid-century we may well know how to produce enough energy via renewables. Maybe. Take a look at California’s 2050 projection on the bar graph. It’s great to see the state getting 70% of its energy from renewables. But you must acknowledge that it will still be getting 30% from fossil fuels and nuclear. And that’s in California, one of the greenest energy states in the union.
It’s easy to say, “Let’s just leave all the fossil fuels in the ground and shutter all the nuclear plants.” But it’s a tough sale to make to the public when the trade off is that it will have to go without the cheap, on demand power that it has become accustom to for generations.
The science is important. But you cannot ignore the economics. Likewise, great policies are easy to construct; possible politics are much, much tougher.
Aren’t you people glad that we didn’t elect this word twister to run our county. What we have is bad, but that’s just ridiculous. Is there any wonder why the democrats are losing membership when their spokespeople are persons like that, at least we dodged one bullet in this climate change war when refused to elect him. Do you think the democrats will be able to sniff him out for what he is, or will they go down with people like that helping to steer the ship.
My work is done here.
You can take a simple “no”, to a simple question and twist it so that I’m implying Mary has made an outrageous claim, and you wonder why no one wants to play with you. In court they call that badgering a witness. Strike three.
I’m glad to hear you believe our government is legitimate. I think it’s an outrageous claim too.
Save my answers if you wish, but there is nothing new there. I have held these positions for some time and they are all supported by the facts. These questions have been asked and answered ad nauseum in Coos County for years. Few are unaware of the pro/con arguments involving the JCEP. In both the court of public opinion and by proxy at the ballot box, the issue has been settled. The people of Coos County have spoken loudly, clearly, and often of this one.
This petition is far from “war.” It is sour grapes.
Here was your question to me. Do YOU think the government in our county is “illegitimate”?
My answer. No!
Thanks for your long answer. That’s exactly the kind of answer I was expecting. You hold on to that answer for as long as you can. I won’t even try to poke holes in it like you would do, but others might. I just want the readers to look it over for themselves and decide if your twisting things in that statement, like the price of NG won’t go up if we export LNG and fracking has proven to be safe. After they see your wrong about those two things the rest of what you say doesn’t matter any more. As I’ve said in a previous post, we won’t settle the issue locally. It will be settled in the streets of our larger cities. I just hope our locals remember who brought us to this dance when the matter is settled and that your party is held accountable in our future elections.
You keep on selling LNG as our savior as long as you can. You have convinced me that you are not a climate change denier. You are a climate change enabler and that’s worse.
All of that is really beside the point here, TR. Perhaps you can explain to me why our local governments are “illigitimate”? Mary won’t (or can’t.)
Further, maybe you can give me an example of a local ordinance superseding state or federal law. Mary’s been coy on that one too.
If you can’t explain it here, I have no idea how you’ll explain it in public. People are going to ask. What will you say?
I understand that you want answers to your questions about her local initiative and I believe she told you it was going to be published soon.
So don’t ask me to answer questions for Mary or explain to you why she refuses to engage with you. I think that answer is pretty obvious. I only choose to engage you to help others learn what your all about and expose what your party stands for, your doing all the hard work for me. Thanks for helping with that.
Do YOU think the government in our county is “illegitimate”?
I will answer your question if you will answer this one question first. Do you think its OK to frack this country just to export LNG? That’s what we will need to do more of to have enough gas for your customers abroad. Did you know that we will have to frack more land just to satisfy our own country’s desire to burn gas for industry. Shouldn’t we wait until our own needs have been settled before we start exporting? Shouldn’t we be leading the world in developing a 100% renewable energy future by building more of those renewable power sources, instead of laying new pipe. Those same workers laying pipe would gladly erect some more wind towers made out of some of the keystoneXL pipeline. Its suppose to be pretty good steel so we should be able to stand some of it on end to generate enough electricity to replace your LNG dreams.
That’s several questions actually. 🙂
I wouldn’t support LNG exports if I didn’t think it was a positive step in battling climate change. I wouldn’t support the JCEP if I didn’t think it was a positive endeavor for the economy of Coos County as well as Oregon. It gets high marks on both counts.
Fracking has been done in the US and abroad for decades. It has largely been done in a very responsible way in the US. We need stronger regulations to ensure that it is always done safely and environmentally responsibly. This is easily done and costs but pennies on the dollar. The fracking being done in the US today will continue whether or not the JCEP goes forward so while it is a national concern it’s not a local issue.
We have enormous stores of natural gas. Exporting it does not compromise our country’s energy security, neither does it have significant impact on the domestic price.
We ARE developing renewable resources. Pres Obama has been instrumental in making this happen. PV solar production in the US has doubled in this year alone. Wind has been on a steady rise on a commercial scale. This is very encouraging. China, Germany, India, and many other countries have seen similar successes. Yet renewables have serious drawbacks, namely scale and reliability. Despite their improvements, they simply do not produce enough energy. Not even close. Worse, they do not deliver energy when people want to use it. These are not insurmountable problems. We will work them out and we will become 100% renewable energy powered one day. But that day is decades away. Decades. What do we do until then? It’s nice to say, “We need to leave all the fossil fuels in the ground,” but no one is willing to sit in the cold, dark so it can happen.
So, how is our local government illegitimate?
That’s already been explained, Mark, in this and a previous post. Please don’t expect people to repeat themselves or cut and paste on your behalf.
To my knowledge only E. Waking has explained why our government is illegitimate. Is that the explanation you’re going with?
TR, you’ve made two fundamentally flawed assumptions. First, you think the relationship between climate change and global energy is simple when it is actually very complex. Second you assume the organization of the Democratic Party is complex when it is actually very simple.
China, Indian, and the rest of the developing world have accelerating energy needs. Where do you propose they get that energy from? Renewables are a great choice. We should do everything we can to encourage their development. A carbon tax would create the kind of market where sustained investment would hasten the kind of rapid R&D we need. Obama’s recent deal with China is a significant step in the right direction. The problem is that renewables do not produce the sheer volume of energy our growing world needs. Until they do we need to look at bridge fuels. NG is the best option. The US has greatly reduced its carbon emissions over the last decade in no small measure because we are burning less coal, and more NG instead. India and Asia are not going to slow down their economies in order to mitigate climate change. They will, however, bur NG instead of coal. We all need them to do that. It is part of the solution, not part of the problem. Unless you want them to burn more coal. Or unless you have a better plan. This is not a simple problem to solve. Its scope is global and its scale will crest 30 trillion kWts by mid-century. If you have a better alternative, please, share.
As for the Democrats, they are, well, democratic. Every county central committee elects its officers from its membership. There are not pressures or instructions issued from either candidates or the state party. It’s as grass roots as you can get. Don’t believe me? Come visit sometime.
First I will address my two fundamentally flawed assumptions, as you put it.
1. At no time and in no place have I ever suggested that the relationship between climate change and global energy is simple. Your first strike.
2. I never stated that the organization of the Democratic Party is complex. Strike two.
Now that whole paragraph in the middle was exactly what I was talking about. You can talk the talk like an inside lobbyist for the gas industry working for the government and manage to get in a self promoting plug for renewable energy in the future to hopefully establish some green credibility and try to make your position look like your concerned for the environment that your project will actually help destroy. You never acknowledge this projects downsides to the locals and you have never provided an example of a post boom town win for locals after the shovels have been put down. On the other hand their are plenty of examples of gas industry projects leaving a wake of death, destruction and loss of property values for the local residents after the booms are done.. The funny thing is you answered your own question about sharing a better alternative when you touched on renewables with your industry rhetoric. Its too bad you can’t see it.
As for the democrats,, they are, well, responsible for Jordan Cove getting a foot hold in this community and your grass root democrats you speak for may survive a few more years locally with a carbon fuel spokesperson like yourself at the helm, but your going to see a lot of changes and pressure coming your way from outside the area, good luck with that.
In other words, you offer no solutions to a very serious problem.
This is to all you Coos County democrats that may be reading this. Its easy to see why MarkM was chosen to be the local democratic chair. He can talk the talk, which can help keep insurrections with-in the party to a minimum for those at the top. His job is to be a shield for those above him, particularly Arnie and Caddy, the two locals from this district and he has been assigned the task to start protecting the CEP and its leadership. As I said he was chosen because he can talk the talk and at the same time protect his uppers, who can’t walk the talk. The bi-partisan effort to build more fossil fuel infrastructures like Jordan Cove will hasten climate change, there’s no denying that FACT without losing your credibility to proven science. If you believe the science that proves mans burning of fossil fuels is bad for future generations, then you have to ask yourself, how can you tolerate being represented by people that are working for the oil/gas industry? If there’s someway you can’t see that this current crop of democrats representing Oregon are all working the system for Jordan Cove, then you need to slap yourself and wake up. If you can see it and like whats going on, your just like MarkM and those he represents. These democrats are exposed, They represent the oil/gas industry and they know how to use human greed to its full extent. In a little over a decade they have infected and consumed all the boards of power that represent our government with gas fever. They pat each other on the back and dream about the money they someday hope to reap. They will sell it to you like they always do, its for the kids. That’s the lie you are caught up in when you vote for any of these people. If they were really doing this(JC) for the kids, you wouldn’t. Plain and simple.
So all you democrats need to get right with this and clean house or quit your party. The problem for you is your house refuses to be cleaned.
Not one fracking democrat has stood up against JC, yet they want the public to think they are trying to protect the climate. I ask the reader, do you think MarkM and the democrats he represents are trying to protect the environment when they promote exporting coal and LNG? Or do you think they are just talking out both sides of their face to save their jobs and satisfy the money interests they represent.
Your acting pretty sure about the plan. Do you still contend that the pipeline will be able to buy its way across Oregon without using eminent domain land seizures?
If land owners hold out for more than their land is worth to you, will you use it then?
Yes. No doubt about it.
Me? No. I’m not involved in the project.
Undoubtedly there will be holdouts. There always are. But note, even you admit they are holding out for more money. They are OK with the project itself. These claims always get settled. The last pipeline that was build in Coos County was done without either eminent domain or a court case. No one is in favor of eminent domain. No one. It is a non-starter proposition. You are fighting a straw man by being against it.
Two years is a long time, It will take longer than that to get all the required permits to start digging. That’s two years that we will be watching your democratic party try to spin its way out of the doghouse your party has created for itself. You will be labeled climate change deniers for acting like republicans. If your party doesn’t change course soon, you will go the way of the dodo bird. This country doesn’t need two parties representing the fossil fools. That’s bad news for the democrats because you are rapidly losing your clout on the environment. The good news is that your party will have to move to the left to survive the wave that’s coming. Your type of democrats look either corrupt or stupid when they are held up against the light we call science. If the democrats continue to act like republicans on the environment, you will lose more elections and the third party movement will continue to grow. The gig is up, the people know who you work for.
Can you give me the names of the Democrats who are climate deniers?
All the ones representing us in Oregon and the ones representing them. Look in the mirror and don’t act stupid. You can’t promote more fossil fuel infrastructure for exporting and expect others to think your not a climate change denier or do you want us to believe that your going to build this just to make a little money and then shut it down before you damage the environment further. Your an idiot if you think you can have your fracking LNG exporting terminal and make people think your concerned about the environment at the same time. Your a poser and transparent just like the democratic party, but please go on, the locals need to see what you are made of, coal man.
I could name them, but doing so on The World site got me banned, unless I “apologized”. So much for what used to be a noble profession. Why don’t we start with Caddy? You know, the one that owns property that profits every time We The People pay for water lines, and power lines, and sewage lines, don’t they? Please correct me if I’m wrong, as these are not accusations, they are an answer and a question, all rolled into one. And please don’t play that sleight of hand for the wealthy, “it’s in a trust”, that is insulting. My personal opinions only, always.
Boost is not an astroturf group. From Wiki:
Astroturfing is the practice of masking the sponsors of a message or organization (e.g. political, advertising, religious or public relations) to make it appear as though it originates from and is supported by grassroots participant(s). It is a practice intended to give the statements or organizations more credibility by withholding information about the source’s financial connection.
Boost has always been transparent about what it is and where its funding comes from. It has been successful because the majority of Coos County residents support its message. You may not agree with that message or like that most people do, but that is the simple truth.
Still like to know why our county governments are “illegitimate.”
I beg to differ. They did not originally acknowledge Jordan Cove’s contribution until the paper divulged and they are totally an astroturf organization. BS Oregon IS NOT a grassroots organization, however…
“the common or ordinary people, especially as contrasted with the leadership or elite of a political party, social organization, etc.; the rank and file.”
I would agree that Boost is not a grassroots organization. It does not fit neatly into either category. But I would contend it has grassroots support. Lots of it.
When JC’s Boost contributions were made public, few people were surprised and it did nothing to slow the grassroots support for the Boost message. Again that’s just the truth. If the majority of Coos County voters/residents did not support the JCEP, Boost would not exist.
BS Oregon ONLY exists because it got a $15K “boost” from JC. Citizens Against LNG, on the other hand, exists because of wide spread opposition to the polluting LNG terminal and its 36″ 224 mile invasive, old growth killing, private property stealing pipeline
Bans the transportation of fossil fuels through and into Coos County except fuels intended for residential,commercial or industrial onsite use for power, heat and vehicle refueling.Agree to disagree. This petition will go a long way toward quantifying the support the JCEP has in Coos County. How many signatures do you need?
If you ran a state wide petition based on this plank — Bans the transportation of fossil fuels through and into Coos County except fuels intended for residential,commercial or industrial onsite use for power, heat and vehicle refueling — I think you’d have a decent chance at passing it. You’d get a ton of support from Multnomah Co. and lots more from the Valley. However, I think you’d get even less support Coos County and other rural areas who don’t like Portland telling us what to do.
Stopping the JCEP is what this petition is really about. All the rest of it about self-government and such just clouds the issue. The more you pack in there, the more you water-down your support. It’s a big gamble especially if you’re acting on a “gut feeling” rather than some empirical, scientific evidence.
Can you quantify “wide spread”? What’s the CAL membership?
“private property stealing” is inflammatory rhetoric. You can’t point to a single square inch of Oregon that has been or will be stolen by the JCEP. That statement is simply dishonest.
Tell that to the landowner who was offered $2,600 bucks for 38 acres of productive timber property and is threatened with eminent domain. You are the one deluding yourself Mark and being dishonest with everyone else.
It’s bad enough you are a gas lover, you don’t also have to be gaseous
Who is that?
Whoever it is, they should contact the offices of DeFazio, Wyden, Merkley, McKeown, or Roblan. At their town halls this year, they’ve asked for the names of people who have been affected by eminent domain and come up empty every time. I’m dubious of the existence of your mysterious landowner.
“Make no mistake, this is war”, is an apt phrase. When the 2016 campaign gets rolling, Hillary will have to explain her support for LNG like she did for the two wars. This report implicates the democrats up to her neck. They can’t have it both ways. If the democrats are run by climate change deniers, the republicans will win. Its going to be fun watching the democrats spin in circles, trying to catch the wind.
NATURAL GAS EXPORTS:
WASHINGTON’S REVOLVING DOOR
FUELS CLIMATE THREAT
http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Natural%20Gas%20Exports-%20Washington%27s%20Revolving%20Door%20Fuels%20Climate%20Threat.pdf
Also, someone sent me this link about other gas and oil funded astroturf pro-gas groups on the West Coast. BS Oregon is one of many infecting California, Oregon and Washington.
http://kuow.org/post/oil-interests-fund-astroturf-groups-washington-oregon
Our government is FOR the people BY the PEOPLE. When government starts taking away peoples rights, it’s no longer a legitimate government. And the people have the right at any time to alter, reform or abolish such government as we see fit (that’s in the Oregon Constitution Article 1, Section 1). Our government has been co-opted by corporations that do NOT have the best interests of the community, or our health in hand. It’s time to make new laws that favor our communities!! Thanks for your blog!!!
Here’s another question for you.
A yes vote will: Declares (sic) all laws adopted by the Oregon Legislature or the United States Congress and any rules adopted by state, federal or international agencies to be the law of Coos County to the extent they do not violate the rights and prohibitions of this ordinance
Can you show precedent for any county ordinance superseding state or federal law?
The silence is deafening. Let me offer a counter example.
Voters in Oregon just approved the legalization of recreational marijuana. All well and good except that marijuana use is still a federal crime. The new law only exists and functions if the federal government does not enforce the federal law. If it chooses to the federal government has the Constitutional authority to lock up recreational marijuana users as it sees fit regardless of whatever law is on the state’s books. Federal law trumps it.
Likewise does state law trump county or municipal law. Again, witness the new marijuana law. Local municipalities have been passing local taxes on prospective recreational marijuana sales. The new law puts those local ordinances in jeopardy. As the new law begins to take effect, local ordinances passed in conflict with the new state law will be overturned. State law trumps local law. In fact, county and municipal governments only exist in the first place at the discretion and creation of the state government. They have no autonomy or authority outside of state statute.
What you’re really talking about here is secession. This is more than an attempt to create a State of Jefferson. It is an attempt to create a Country of Jefferson. I have no idea where you get the inkling that that is what the residents of Coos County want.
Could you post a copy of the Bill of Rights and the petition so we the public can view it? Thanks.
Will publish the full text next week.
I look forward to that. It would be nice to know what it is we’re talking about.
SUMMARY: A yes vote will:
Establish a bill of rights for a sustainable energy future. Declares (sic) current municipal system of
governance in Coos County illegitimate . . .
On what grounds do you declare our current municipal government “illegitimate”?
Let me respond to the deafening silence on this one too.
We just had an election in Coos County. CC Voters cast ballots for two representatives to the federal government. They voted for two representatives to the state government. They voted for one representative in the county government (the second one this year.) They voted for mayors, council members, and board members all across the county. Participation was a higher-than-state-average of 73%. There are no reports of election fraud, malfeasance, or corruption.
Our local governments are entirely legitimate. They are comprised of precisely the representatives Coos County voters have chosen in open, honest, transparent, fair elections. To say that our local government is “illegitimate” is an indictment on democracy itself. It is a claim that is entirely without substance or evidence.
You state: “Allies of the invasion have even figured out a way to plunder the treasury without firing a shot in the form of the so-called CEP (Community Enhancement Plan).”
But our last election shows no evidence that even a small minority of voters are opposed to the CEP. The city councils of North Bend and Coos Bay took on an increasing role in the implementation of the CEP over the last year. Yet not one single candidate opposed to the CEP emerged to run for an open, UNCONTESTED seat. Not one. If Coos Bay voters were outraged about the CEP, surely one of them would have run for this seat. The truth is, they are not outraged about it at all. The CEP has wide community support. That support is both demonstrable and legitimate.
“we will use Paid Media to effectively deploy our narrative in highly contextual and targeted spaces to inform or engage the audience.”
We have lost the ONLY profession mentioned in the Constitution, a free and open press. No professionalism in all of Coos County’s “press”. Who would have thought a local newspaper would spread it’s legs for a couple full page ads? It’s heart-breaking to those of us who grew up cherishing our right to know what goes on around us. But sadly, we have nothing but paid stenographers who drop their drawers for a few shekels. My personal opinion only, always. THAT is our biggest hurdle, thank you for this site, may others find it as well. Thanking you again.