Success, as defined by Webster’s Dictionary is “the favorable or prosperous termination of attempts or endeavors.” The measure of success must then factor in the loftiness of goals and the effort required to achieve them, i.e. successfully brewing a cup of coffee or changing the world. A recent newsletter put out by SCDC a local economic development agency ignores its failure to implement any of the SDAT recommendations and instead defines success thusly-
We have seen amazing success stories in the past year – Oregon Resources Corporation, a $110 million investment on the South Coast, with 80 newly created direct jobs, and over 135 indirect new and retained jobs,
spread across a multitude of local companies…the re-opening of the South Coast’s rail line…and new air service flights to Portland from Southwest Oregon Regional Airport
Though SCDC had little or nothing to do with ORC locating in Coos County to mine chromite the company’s investment in a single purpose facility that can be dismantled and moved elsewhere is subsidized by the taxpayers in the form of a five year property tax abatement. Those jobs, some paying less than $15 hour will cost the taxpayer an estimated $3 million. Despite this investment Coos County has suffered a net loss of 240 jobs just since November 2010.
Most flights are subsidized and the cost of bringing the Coos Bay Rail Line, single track with limited capacity, up to snuff is still undetermined and it is hard to see how a net job loss meets the definition of success by anyone’s measurement much less an agency tasked with job creation but that hasn’t stopped SCDC and its chairman of the board, Jon Barton, from attacking its critics and implying they are too stupid to understand complex concepts.
As with every situation involving significant change, there will be those who speak out loudly against that which they don’t understand..[Emphasis mine]
There you have it, if anyone finds flaws in their logic, or fault with their reasoning or present contradictory statistical and empirical data opposing their claims then those people just “don’t understand”. Barton, in a recent letter takes the State Attorney General, John Kroger, to task for enforcing the law and protecting Oregonians by curtailing federal agencies from superseding state rights and ignoring rules that might infringe upon the rights of Oregon property owners. He characterizes Kroger doing his job protecting Oregonians as an ideological move, and accuses the AG of “…ignoring the 13% unemployment rate on Oregon’s south coast and the fact that 26% for the populace is below the federal poverty level and half the children in our schools qualify for subsidized lunches or that our entire infrastructure, schools, roads, government buildings, is crumbling away with no money to fix it…” and sacrificing jobs in order to “save the planet.”
Notwithstanding the failure of any of the economic development schemes promoted by SCDC; coal export, LNG, chromite, etc… all located in urban renewal or enterprise zones, to contribute anything toward repairing crumbling infrastructure and underfunded schools, it seems that Barton is completely oblivious to the damage environmental degradation has on the economy. The trees are all cut down and the streams damaged so that salmon can’t spawn and for someone touting the area as a “resource extraction economy” (SDAT suggested that stop) surely he ought to be able to see the benefit of taking care of that resource so it can continue to produce. The goose won’t be laying golden eggs without some nourishment and health care.
[See what a coal export terminal looks like]
Imagination is defined as “the act or power of forming a mental image of something not present to the senses or never before wholly perceived in reality.” What if we imagined a South Coast without the Port Commission and SCDC, would any of us really notice much? After all, both seem firmly entrenched in perpetuating finite 19th century industries with no place in the future. Would we actually notice if they both just went away? Economic development in Coos County is only constrained by a failure of imagination.
SCDC can’t imagine community owned projects like environmentally responsible forests, fisheries, organic agriculture and energy production. They can’t see past an old paradigm of centralized control and profiteering that has so plundered rural America like the conduct of Weyco and GP. They believe because there was once a prosperous carriage and buggy manufacturer, or a steam engine repair shop or a ball and musket factory that it should all be the same again. They can’t imagine an estuarine used for anything else than bulk export and even then they can’t beat nature’s own topographical and meteorological impediments to such a scheme.
The gate posts at the forward operating base where my son was stationed in Ramadi in 2004 were covered with axioms to remind every convoy before each outing of the dangers they faced. “Complacency Kills” warned one and “Adapt or Die” urged another. In Joseph Tainter’s, The Collapse of Complex Societies, it is postulated that great empires like the Romans did not collapse as suspected as a result of resource depletion, rather they fell because their leaders failed to adapt to diminishing resources. Adapt or die.
The world is changing and Coos County cannot expect or even want things to ever be the way they were, look where rampant unrestrained extraction has left us, and should instead embrace a future of diversity and change and sustainability. Alas, SCDC and the Port have been unable or unwilling to implement the recommendations of the Sustainable Design Assessment Team and so, to quote Jon Barton, if we don’t remove the stifling influence of these two agencies and their affiliates, if they don’t just “get out of the way” of a 22nd century greener future, Coos County will soon “become wards of this state.”
Coos County does not have to limit its potential to the fossilized vision of SCDC, the Port and the Chamber of Commerce. The county is not constrained by their failure of imagination, but only by the funds they extract from the economy to invest in foolish backward looking schemes. The county does not have to buy into an unsightly LNG terminal on the North Spit that will bring no more prosperity to Coos County than similar terminals have done elsewhere. The county does not have to be constrained by the lack of imagination demonstrated by Jon Barton and Sandy Messerle pushing coal and gas.
Instead the citizens can develop their own jobs plan and form their own community projects and let their imaginations run wild with the unlimited possibility of a renewable future.
Beirut imagines and implements a bright future.
Multipurpose wind turbines for wide scale distributed energy.
Economic leakage is a term used to describe money that looks as if it is benefiting a particular area is actually going elsewhere. The JOB Messiahs documents not only a long history of economic failure but helps point the spotlight on how these schemes keep the county mired in poverty and decline by wasting resources on projects that support economic leakage.
For the New Year, imagine the county without a port and SCDC intruding on economic development and let small business, the real economic backbone of the country, envision an affordable and sustainable future.
Cut Urban Renewal all together. Local education can use the tax monies gained by not having to distribute collected funds to UR.
Excellent piece, thanks M. Can’t wait to see who’s running.
After the New Year, we should see some more candidates file to run and find out if there is anyone we want to even consider voting for. Fred and Cam may be waiting to file or thinking they should apply for the CEO job…
Mark wrote: Coal and LNG are not resource extraction industries in Coos County. They are shipping and transportation industries. The SDAT is talking about mining our own coal or shipping raw logs. ORC could fit there conceivably even though the material is processed here. Chromite is a value-added product.
Lets get this figured out, and look at these loopholes your exposing. Since coal and LNG are only going THROUGH Coos County, they are not resource extraction industries in Coos County. Thereby exempt from the SDAT.
“The SDAT is talking about mining our own coal or shipping raw logs”. Who told you that? Please show us that part of the report.
“Chromite is a value-added product”. So if another country adds the value its exempt from the SDAT?
Is this cherry picking or loopholes? Yea your a typical politician. Good luck getting converts here, lol.
.
All you have to do is mention him, and unlike snagglepuss(the old fiftys cartoon), he enters stage left, carrying the banner for these conservative democrats. He must have changed his mind about theworldlink being a bird cage liner, and grew fond of Mrs. Messerle.
Mary writes:
“SCDC can’t imagine community owned projects like environmentally responsible forests, fisheries, organic agriculture and energy production.”
Let’s set aside what the SCDC can or cannot imagine.
What is stopping things like these from happening right now? Particularly organic agriculture and de-centralized energy production. Why can’t those things be vibrant, growing businesses in Coos County right now without a nod or a thought from the SCDC, COC, Port, or any other governmental/business agency/group?
What do they lack to get off the ground? Capital? Market? Regulations? What are those entrepreneurs waiting for?
AP,
Your point was, if I’m understanding it correctly, that the SCDC is doing the exact opposite of what the SDAT report recommends. I don’t think that’s true at all. Much as I agree wholeheartedly with the two pieces of the report you cite, I don’t see how they prove that point.
Coal and LNG are not resource extraction industries in Coos County. They are shipping and transportation industries. The SDAT is talking about mining our own coal or shipping raw logs. ORC could fit there conceivably even though the material is processed here. Chromite is a value-added product.
You’re absolutely right about the public participation piece. LBJ used to say, “You have to have everyone on board for the take-off so that they are they for the landing.” Good point.
I don’t think it’s fruitless at all to discuss these things. Isn’t that what public participation is all about?
Responding to – MarkM
You state; “I think the SDAT report is an invaluable resource for our community. We need to listen to the entirety of its message and not cherry pick it to suit our own personal agenda.”
So why have you done exactly that? And how is it that you missed so many relevant and important details such as;
“…Inclusive and Participatory Processes. Public participation is the foundation of good community design. The SDAT involves a wide range of stakeholder viewpoints and utilizes short feedback loops, resulting in sustainable decision-making that has broad public support and ownership.”
“…Companies that extract natural resources for export, rather than developing a sustainable local economy do not provide the kind of jobs growth needed by the region.”
I could go on and on but I have already learned it would be fruitless…
AP! TR! Don’t be so coy. Do tell.
Responding to – The Reminder –
I always thought RUSerious could be Fred. I think you have it wrong however, as Fred K has no love for SCDC or the millions they have wasted to date. He sees right through them for exactly what they are.
On the other hand, I have heard that a certain someone who has commented on this site will run against Messerle and that person is everything you say…
“That becomes more than apparent in SCDC’s first newsletter you have linked here as it does just the opposite of what the SDAT report recommended.”
I see this sentiment expressed here quite often. It is mistaken. The SDAT report is quite impressed with the economic potential of the Port of Coos Bay and is very supportive of developing it. It observes:
“Our Team found a number of assets and amenities in Coos County which the area can use as the foundation for diversifying its economy and building a stronger economic base in the future. These include its:
“Deep-water port, the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay, the largest deep draft coastal harbor between San Francisco and the Puget • Sound; has a Federally-authorized navigation channel designed and maintained by the US Army Corps of Engineers and six marine terminals, seven deep-draft berths, and barge facilities
“Railroad (Purchased by the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay in 2009; a transportation asset once a short-line rail operator is on-board, • necessary improvements are made, and a schedule established)”
Furthermore, SDAT recommends,
“* Shipping/Warehouse and Distribution: A “natural” selection, given these are already important industries in Coos County; the county’s location on the Pacific coast; and the facilities and amenities offered by the Port of Coos Bay and the Southwest Oregon Regional Airport. Potential industry sectors to target are:
Port-related industries/opportunities
General/refrigerated warehouses/storage
Logistics consultants and 3rd party logistics providers
To be sure, the SDAT also recommends value-added agriculture and fishing, wood products, tourism, high tech manufacturing, and renewable energy (although not de-centralized). But the port and the railroad are key pieces of the economic mix for Coos County according to the SDAT. The Port commission has that right.
I think the SDAT report is an invaluable resource for our community. We need to listen to the entirety of its message and not cherry pick it to suit our own personal agenda.
Politics, what and who they represent. The new year will signal the start for the run for local office. The following comment is relevant, because this person will make a run at Messerle’s seat. His identity has been exposed here at this site and his mind set should be noted by the community. He apparently had a different opinion of theworldlink last summer, or pretended such. He is a poser, a shill, a hackman for SCDC. Can you guess who it is?
RUSerious
June 1, 2011 – 7:08 am
Now we get editorials that the daily bird cage liner apparently believes are needed to justify their reporters crappy writing. There is no comparison between Astoria and Coos Bay. The bird cage liner misleads about cruise lines; they conveniently forget the local Costco; they forget the local Home Depot; they ignore the nearby thousands of Washington residents who cross the bridge for sales tax free Oregon shopping; they ignore people friendly commissioners; voters who throw non responsive commissioners out of office; coordinated efforts of the locals to improve their community; recognition that Astoria is a tourist based community; and the nearby masses of Portland residents taking day trips in good weather.
ORC is here! Unless the market for their product collapses, they are not leaving. When you have one daily paper editor claiming that he worked his entire career of at least 30 years so he would end up at a minimum circulation, second rate, six day per week paper – except holidays – in the boonies of America; and his partner editor who has written about his neighbors and customers as “idiots”; editors who apparently do not understand business but parrot the proganda of ORC to convince the people that the people should lose money so ORC can mine county lands, it’s time for Main and his supporters to educate the people why he thinks as he does. Does not make good business sense to me to willingly lose $30,000 per acre of peoples owned forest annually in return for a $2 acre payment from ORC. Expect Messerle to do whatever is required to make his SCDC queen wife a success. In the past two years she has done nothing except spend your tax dollars. The voters of Coos County would never have elected (unknown) Parry and (known) Messerle. These two fellows have less than one year before the next election. Not too early to locate people who can lead this county into the future.
You have nailed it MGX.
If these guys are not stopped they will cause our functioning economy of the south coast to continue to wither and die and its people either move away or become wards of the state. They are putting us on a fast track to that right now. Why do we allow our tax dollars to fund such a despicable group of underqualified interminable obstructionist who do everything they can to fight true sustainable progress while supporting the very same outdated ways of doing things that have gotten us right where we are today? Heaven forbid these guys actually did a little research instead of basing their decisions on hearsay or their own outdated unsupported ideology.
The only real cure in this case is to stop funding these guys. It is past time to get the ‘good ole boys’ and/or their wives out of the picture and insist on truly qualified, intelligent individuals taking their place …or abolishing the group altogether. You will never get the current lot at SCDC on the same level as the American Institute of Architects. They are just not even close to being in that league. This is why they do not understand the AIA’s SDAT report nor do they have a clue about how to implement it. That becomes more than apparent in SCDC’s first newsletter you have linked here as it does just the opposite of what the SDAT report recommended.
There is a pretty good letter in Saturday’s (Dec 24th 2011) World paper which nails the resource extraction issue pretty good also in case anyone missed it.
Thanks MGX for your great overview here. I only wish more people could understand this.
Well said, Magix.
Thank you!
Thank you, that needed saying. Critics don’t generally speak-up, until they have understood that better ways do exist. The port has circled itself with special interest speculators, that are not only not accomplishing their goals, but are actually harmful to the established economy and any future industries that could bring prosperity to the region. It does no good to list them, nothing new can penetrate the mindset of those helping the fossil fuel speculators, and they are many and far reaching.
Some may also like this;
Rob Hopkins reminds us that the oil our world depends on is steadily running out. He proposes a unique solution to this problem — the Transition response, where we prepare ourselves for life without oil and sacrifice our luxuries to build systems and communities that are completely independent of fossil fuels.
http://www.ted.com/talks/rob_hopkins_transition_to_a_world_without_oil.html